<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, Sue Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/so-sue-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/so-sue-me/</link>
	<description>marina da gama</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:06:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/so-sue-me/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/take-me-to-court/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>This &#039;bottom up&#039; (so-called) Independent Security Schemes consultation process is a farce.  It automatically excludes anybody who doesn&#039;t buy into a Marina wide security scheme and thus isn&#039;t what it claims to be.  Furthermore, the amendments to the constitution were voted on based on a specific budget and security plan which have been aborted.  To adopt the amendments and then embark on a (so-called) consultation process to justify making the amendments is pulling the cart before the horse - an absolute nonsense. 

It again begs the question: why does the MDGA not invite its attorneys and auditor to answer questions at an open forum for all members?  Then everybody can participate and obtain straight answers to the very many queries and concerns members have regarding the controversial amendments and proposed Marina wide security scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8216;bottom up&#8217; (so-called) Independent Security Schemes consultation process is a farce.  It automatically excludes anybody who doesn&#8217;t buy into a Marina wide security scheme and thus isn&#8217;t what it claims to be.  Furthermore, the amendments to the constitution were voted on based on a specific budget and security plan which have been aborted.  To adopt the amendments and then embark on a (so-called) consultation process to justify making the amendments is pulling the cart before the horse &#8211; an absolute nonsense. </p>
<p>It again begs the question: why does the MDGA not invite its attorneys and auditor to answer questions at an open forum for all members?  Then everybody can participate and obtain straight answers to the very many queries and concerns members have regarding the controversial amendments and proposed Marina wide security scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/so-sue-me/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/take-me-to-court/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>I too have ignored any demands made by them and will continue to do so.  If they want to sue me, they must mar do so.  Maybe, when the summonses start coming, we should all get together and defend ourselves &quot;en masse&quot; (I think that is how it is spelt).  In other words, lets stick together.  There is safety in numbers.  Of course, I shall then not remain Anonymous any more. (hee, hee).

So by the way, does the agency the Association uses still belong to Mr. Hepple?  Oi, he is a bit scary, but then, I am not going to be intimidated by a bully.

I think Anita is marvelous.  Long live Anita and thanks for your courage.  Maybe you will enspire some others to grow a backbone too. (or those big cahoonas you have)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have ignored any demands made by them and will continue to do so.  If they want to sue me, they must mar do so.  Maybe, when the summonses start coming, we should all get together and defend ourselves &#8220;en masse&#8221; (I think that is how it is spelt).  In other words, lets stick together.  There is safety in numbers.  Of course, I shall then not remain Anonymous any more. (hee, hee).</p>
<p>So by the way, does the agency the Association uses still belong to Mr. Hepple?  Oi, he is a bit scary, but then, I am not going to be intimidated by a bully.</p>
<p>I think Anita is marvelous.  Long live Anita and thanks for your courage.  Maybe you will enspire some others to grow a backbone too. (or those big cahoonas you have)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/so-sue-me/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marinasecurity.mylifeinsa.com/2008/03/07/take-me-to-court/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>A few years back I received a final demand from a renowned Marina debt collection agency for outstanding sub&#039;s. I immediately wrote back demanding they prove the legality of the Association&#039;s demands for outstanding monies. I have never received a reply!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years back I received a final demand from a renowned Marina debt collection agency for outstanding sub&#8217;s. I immediately wrote back demanding they prove the legality of the Association&#8217;s demands for outstanding monies. I have never received a reply!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

